Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Beyond Prop 8

I used to think that the whole gay marriage issue was not that big of a deal. “Sure, I don’t believe in it, but it doesn’t really affect me, so why bother, right?” I would think to myself. I probably thought this mostly because of my quiet nature and my desire to not get involved in confrontations but there was also maybe a little rebellion towards the way the Political Right and The Church seemed to blend a lot of the time in this country and I was sick of being associated with the Republican Party just because I was a Christian. But this was, as I like to call, thought without thinking, and I think differently now. The passing of Proposition 8 in California was great for proponents of traditional marriage, however, it has left in its wake a vast amount of people feeling the sting of discrimination and demanding their rights. And it’s those two things I think Prop 8 did not delve into and I’d like to discuss: discrimination and rights.

The Right to Get Married
I don’t want to sound heretical, but sometimes when trying to explain my viewpoint on controversial issues (which are almost always bolstered by my faith in Christ), I like to use empirical proofs or analytical evidence to support my claims. I do this knowing that people who do not believe Christ will also be involved in these issues and using the phrase “because the Bible says so” is not an aide to the progression of a debate with someone who doesn’t believe the Bible to be true. Now, I could give many evidences of the Bible’s reliability, but that’s not what I’m discussing at this moment. However, in this instance, I must go to the Bible because I don’t know where else I would go. Marriage did not begin with the state, but with God. Can you imagine the first marriage? No joint or separate bank accounts, no tax write-offs, or child credits, no rules for hospital visits (no hospitals for that matter) – just His command for man to leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife and become one flesh. This misnomer of people’s “right to get married” is not based on what a God-given privilege marriage actually is (I use the word “privilege” purposefully), but on what people can get out of it for themselves.

Discrimination
This is where the final knot in the noose sits; a noose that threatens to strangle another piece of our country’s foundation: we are replacing an identity with a behavior lifestyle and calling it the same thing.


First off, to those who claim that homosexuality is an identity, I would present the numerous amounts of people who have gone from leading a gay lifestyle and are now not a part of it, and also vise versa. Did these people change the very core of who they were in order to do this? I would think African Americans don’t wake up one day and tell themselves, “You know, I think I’ll be Hispanic today.” Secondly, this comparison that is being made between the human rights movement for women and African Americans and gay marriage is simply appalling at best, and hateful at worst. The opponents of Proposition 8 claim that it is a step back in the civil rights movement and they couldn’t possibly imagine how we as a country could take back what many have worked so hard to overcome. Now, I’m not an African American and I’m not a woman, so I can’t even imagine what these two groups have had to endure to come to where they are today. But there are few things that I could think to be more hateful than to compare the senseless beating of a black man simply because he’s black to the “right” of a gay couple to get married because of the way they have chosen to live their life. This category mistake has got to come to an end to where we can make a true dichotomy between that which is innate and that which is behavior. Let us stop explaining away our own propensities to behave or behave otherwise as identity markers that cannot be changed or stopped.


I would like to point out two things as I close:

  1. We as humans are a unique people. We differentiate ourselves from every other being on earth by the way we think, rationalize, love, hate, seek revenge, plot, scheme, invent, create, explore, cry, care. However, we are also so different within ourselves. We look different, sound different, smell different and act different than anyone else ever has or will. We are completely unique from each other as individuals and I don’t think that it takes much to see this as a fact.
  2. We make choices every day. Some are good, some, not so good. In fact, I think I could make an argument for we as people being, at our cores, people of wrath and disorder (or sin) and not very good choice makers. Whether you look at a serial killer, a riot at after a World Cup soccer game (which, I have to say, is just ridiculous…it’s a soccer game!), or even a toddler left to his or her own devices, it’s not very hard to find some pretty good evidence in favor of this viewpoint.

So, when we combine our unique individuality with our propensity to sin, you can see how the ways in which we sin can become numerous to say the least. The thing about this is that God sees them all and He sees them all the same way, whether you’re talking about homosexual or heterosexual sin, or any sin for that matter. There are no favorites in His eyes, no thing that we can say or do to make Him see past the thick layer of corruption we all carry. Here on earth, our judgments are based on the degrees to which the law was broken and certain sins carry with them varying degrees of consequence. It is not hard to see the difference between the sting of a lie and the utter hatred and humiliation an adulterous relationship can bring. But God’s hand of judgment falls the same on all, and I write this knowing that my sin, the things I've done in public and in secret, should have buried me a thousand times over according to God’s standard. However, this same God lovingly provided the way out of the grime and the mire of my sin. All I did was take it; all I did was yield. And He offers this same thing to anyone who would do the same. This all may seem confusing, how a God could be loving, but also seem so harsh and unwavering. But, you see, that is His identity. It is impossible for Him to be anything else. James MacDonald, pastor of Harvest Bible Chapel in Rolling Meadows, Illinois, I think, puts it correctly when he says that “God’s love is not a pampering love, but a perfecting love.” His love is offered now, but His judgment is eminent. So let us all consider how we define ourselves, not in light of anything that we think, but in light of what God has said, for He is the giver of our rights, the sustainer of our lives…the maker of our identities.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Relativism and Middle School English

When I think about all of the classes I have ever taken in my years of growing up in school, English, by far, left me with the most emotional scars. This, of course, is an over-exaggeration, but for some reason, it was such a struggle for me to be motivated to do my best in this class. I don’t really know why…there’s nothing inherently wrong with English. I know many wonderful people (my wife, my sister-in-law) who happen to have liked English, and I even married one of them! (I’ll give you a hint, it wasn’t my sister-in-law). I’m just not that way. Now, if you give me a math problem, that’s a different story. In fact, I’ve been known to help my brother-in-law with his algebra and geometry homework for fun – that’s right, FOR FUN! Yes, of course I wanted to help him out. But come on, you don’t get many chances in life to go back and hone your skills on arc tangents or Green’s Theory. All of this to say one thing – I’m not too fond of studying English.

However, I’ve been noticing something in our country (as many others have as well) that has made me return to English class. I started noticing this trend a few years ago, even though it started a long time ago, and has really come into fruition with the likes of Oprah Winfrey, Eckhart Tolle, and even our new president, Barack Obama. It is the wonderful world of relativism that we live in today, and the people we as a country lift up the highest are the ones spouting its message the loudest. So, let’s take an English lesson, shall we?

The Declarative Sentence

Now class, declarative sentences contain a subject and a predicate and are used to form statements such as, “The sky is blue” and “These pretzels are making me thirsty”. They are used to state a fact or argument, and make up a vast majority of the sentences that we use in speech and literature. Those who push the movement of relativism have also used declarative sentences such as, “What is true for you is not true for me”, “That is your truth”, or the infamous “There is no truth”. But we have to step back and ask ourselves, “What is a declarative sentence implying?” (which happens to be an interrogative sentence, but that’s another lesson). A declarative sentence, by nature, is stating some bit of truth. In fact, you could put the tag “It is true that…” to the beginning of each of these sentences.

  • It is true that the sky is blue.
  • It is true that what is true for you is not true for me.
  • It is true that there is no truth. HOW CAN THAT BE!? (another interrogative)

So, we come to a dilemma. It seems to be that to live in a relativistic world we have to give up making statements of any kind. Like the one I just made…and that one…and that one…and that one. In fact, without an absolute truth, we not only lose our ability to converse, communicate or have opinions, but to exist as a country. Freedom of speech would be rendered meaningless because people’s speech would have no value, since it is only true for the one giving the speech. The court system could not exist without it. Our laws, although put into place by us, did not begin with us. There is a reason why murder, arson, kidnapping, and a vast array of other crimes are illegal in this country and that reason does not come from us. It comes from someplace much deeper, but I’ll leave that for another post. So in a nut shell: A nation of relativity writes its own death sentence and that sentence is declarative.

Admonition

Before you read any further, I want to make a few things clear about this blog. I am not here to stir up dissention between anyone, nor am I here to start a revolution. I am here because I am normally a pretty quiet person, but I feel that it is time that I start speaking, mainly just to get my thoughts out, but also to discuss them with others. I invite anyone to reply, comment, or start a discussion on any of the future blog posts as they choose. I want this to be an environment where people can agree or debate, but not argue, because there is a big difference.